Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's a personal attack and offensive and inappropriate.

My point was about information as the desired content. For that point I gave some examples, today before coming to HN, after HN, and some recent reading, and those were good examples of information to make my point. The point is the content, and the examples were fully appropriate.

I made a point, clearly, strongly, and thoroughly. Apparently my doing so made you angry. Apparently you resent seeing points made.

You are angry about something, but I did nothing wrong. Your anger is something you have done wrong.

You are attacking me and not my thoughts.



My last sentence was possibly out of line. For that, I apologize.

The remainder of my comments can in no reasonable way be interpreted as a personal attack. They only concerned your comment, and I stand by them. You may believe you made a point clearly, strongly, and thoroughly; I seriously disagree.

Also, be careful about conflating anger and disagreement.


Your

> seemingly overflowing with the opinion that ten_fingers is the most important person in the world and the rest of us should drop everything to absorb his every utterance

is not supported with facts and is based on nothing solid, just a wild opinion, full of anger, wildly wrong, insulting, and out of place. Say something like to someone in person in a bar and risk getting a bottle broken over your head.

All I did was comment on the article's claims of some good writing lesson. I don't think the lesson was good and used examples to illustrate why. What I wrote was fine and deserved no insults.


>Apparently my doing so made you angry.

no, your ineptitude made him contemptuous.

>Apparently you resent seeing points made.

assume at least minimum competence on behalf of your audience

yeah I deserve downvotes for this, but I can't abide overconfident naivete, too brittle to take a punch




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: