Funny, as I was seeing a lot of people try and push that the gender of language is fully separate from gender of sex. The idea being that there was no real connection between them. I always find this a tough conversation because of how English is not a heavily gendered language. I have no idea how much gender actually enters thinking in the languages that we say are gendered.

My favorite example of this used to be my kids talking about our chickens. Trying to get them to use feminine pronouns for the animals is basically a losing game. That cats are still coded as primarily female, despite us never having a female cat; is largely evidence to me that something else is going on there.

I'm curious if you have reading on the last point. Can't promise to get to it soon, but I am interested in the ideas.

I edited my previous comment. See here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirah%C3%A3_language

There are also a ton of videos and blog posts on the subject.

Thanks! I should have been clear on the request, too. I'm curious if there are any good high density reads, as well as if there are some to avoid. It can be easy to fall into poor sources that over claim on what they are talking about. And I don't mean nefariously. Often enthusiasm is its own form of trap.

Ah I gotcha. Sorry, it's just something I've skimmed at the surface level. The videos do refer to the key researchers, do you could look up their papers. I'm not sure what else would make sense.

> I have no idea how much gender actually enters thinking in the languages that we say are gendered.

Not much. It's mostly inference rules, just like in English use of pronouns. I's just more pervasive, pertaining to verbs, adjectives, etc... If we're talking about gendered living organism, then it's just a marker for that binary classification. Anything else, it's just baggage attached to the word.