I'm not arguing with you (as there is no real substance to your comments with which to argue), I'm merely confused about your series of non-sequiturs. Bringing up Mullenweg under a blog post made by not the CEO of a different company whose behavior up to now has been very different from Mullenweg's is just... not very relevant. Due to this I charitably assumed you might not be aware of the actual corporate dynamics and proceeded accordingly. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Don't need or want your misplaced charity. The vote to derailment ratio over the past day tells me you're the odd one out. This has been fun, take care. Hopefully more effectively.
