If you're a political appointee. I guaran-damn-tee you the proles below the rank of four-star (or possibly below Cabinet secretary) will still be getting spanked for security violations.
> since these guys are just doing war crime after war crime, it's a good thing if it leaks
Irrelevant. One, we’re no longer in an era of international rules-based order. All the great powers agree on this.
Two, the definition of war crimes has expanded so broadly as to include any collateral damage. This overinclusiveness has rendered the term meaningless, with everyone calling everything they don’t like a war crime.
There will be consequences for this administration. But not because they bombed a terrorist commander.
>Two, the definition of war crimes has expanded so broadly as to include any collateral damage. This overinclusiveness has rendered the term meaningless
Can you provide real examples of actual journalists or governments doing this? Random FB commenters don't know what any words mean, but I haven't seen this to be the case in actual official channels. Asserting that it is meaningless feels like trying to downplay or trivialize real war crimes that are actually happening.
which empire? the energy cartels or global finance? The national baton is passed on as cursory reading of Western history over the past few centuries [shows].
let's hope it's reaching its endpoint friend. it seems like the natural country to pick up the baton is China, but they have a sufficiently different economic system that maybe there will be a break in the chain. it depends on the strength, rationality, and solidarity of the CPC.
And then have an unsecured internet line connected to an unsecured computer in your Pentagon office[1]
[1] https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hegseth-signal-app-connected...