I'd wager that paying customers really don't care whether the images look AI-generated or not.

They care much more about whether this product solves a problem they have.

This is based on my 17 years of running first a successful B2C product then a successful B2B SaaS.

Minor changes to one's home page tend to have little observable change in numbers of trial signups, the rate of conversion to paid customer, and so on.

> I'd wager that paying customers really don't care whether the images look AI-generated or not.

Maybe, but in a conversation about acquiring your first hundred users; you don't have a lot of word-of-mouth backing up the quality of your product. Your ability to effectively present your product will never be more important.

If it's important enough that your brochure website has images on it at all, then it's also important enough for them to not look like something you'd see slapped on a scam.

I also think those images are not super aesthetically pleasing but I also don’t care about the sink metaphor they’re using so I instantly ignore them and just focus on the text

wow I didn't see it that way at all, they looked good to me.

They are very obviously "AI generated genre" which many still don't pick up on. Whether art that is obviously AI-generated is appealing or effective - that may also be the case

shrug, i don't mind, looks good

Still a tiny bit better than the "massive limbs bendy people" corporate style.

It's called Corporate Memphis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_Memphis)

Might be soulless and ugly too, but at least it doesn't make your customer think "Hold on is this a scam?"

I’m not sure seeing AI art and thinking scam is a thing. Most people can’t even spot AI art.

His website seems fine to me.

It’s actually quite interesting how both styles can be considered slop, but Corporate Memphis evokes different association. It makes me think that style did something right.

> It's immediately obvious to me that the illustrations are AI slop

I don't believe this qualifies as AI Slop. They are all consistent in their style and thus 'on brand' for what they are trying to convey. While visuals are fairly subjective and these may not speak to you, they don't have 'obvious slop characteristics' eg 6 fingers or 3 eyes imho.

If you can tell immediately that an illustration is AI-made, for me it already qualifies as slop. It gives low quality, lack of effort, "Is this website legit or is this some guy running a scam from their bedroom in Malaysia" type vibe

Are you upset by the kitchen sink metaphor? lmao

?