Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Is a standards body being involved relevant?

I believe it is. Taking the example of ATproto, it boils down to a managed platform as a service but they seem to do a #BuildInPublic thing where we can experience early developer previews. That’s not really open and it isn’t a standard.



How are these not "open" if they're GitHub projects and entirely open source and open to outside contribution?

The organizations that create "standards" are much less open than this, requiring in person lobbying, schmoozing, travel, and company affiliations.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: