Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

$14.3 Billion seems excessive for it to be a pure aquihire play. There's undoubtedly some IP acquisition (or at least exclusive access to certain IP) involved.


Their fantasy money from ScaleAI’s inflated valuation will easily balance this out on the books.


I know "excessive" is technically correct, but at the same time it seems an understatement.


It's about 0.85% of Meta's market cap - less than the 1% they paid for (granted, all of) Instagram. They also paid about 1% of market cap for Oculus ($2b into a ~$220b market cap)

Seems about par for Facebook when it comes to company-shifting acquisitions.


Little known secret is they paid $2.7B, not $2B. And Zuck and the FB head of M&A were talking shit about John Carmack’s crazy wife, who was doing his negotiation for him. On WhatsApp no less.


That sounds about right. Thanks for the insight.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: