The money is not infinite in any sense so it is for many pragmatic purposes a competition, the diseases with more attention get more research, so it's in the reasonable interests of the people to advocate for the diseases that are most likely to affect them personally.
For sure.
I would like to point out for readers to think about the fact that if you are, say, a guy in your 30s, the women close to you getting breast cancer will also have a profound impact on your life. Likely a greater one than dying of prostate cancer in your 80s.
Maybe (hopefully) neither of those happen! Maybe you get prostate cancer in your 30s! I just hope one can realize that getting the disease oneself is not the only way the disease can affect them, far from it.
And yet you chose to reply to this comment instead of the parent :)
CW is a thing, cant's wish it away. Best to work on rules of engagement and being at least slightly productive about it. Small steps like https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/but-vs-yes-but. Seems trivial, but I'd love to see more informal rules like this enforced in practice.
I’m sure I don’t understand what you’re saying! Could you explain? I’m not being facetious, either. I’m not sure how posting this to the parent would have made any sense.
According to the American Cancer Society, it is estimated that there will be over 62,000 more cases of breast cancer than prostate cancer in the US this year, and will kill over 6000 more people.
>The American Cancer Society’s estimates for prostate cancer in the United States for 2025 are:
