Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> In business, quickly I'd say, we will realise that the vast majority of worthwhile communication necessarily must be produced by people -- as authors of what they want to say.

But what fraction of communication is "worthwhile"?

I'm an academic, which in theory, should be one of the jobs that requires the most thinking. And still, I find that over half of the writing I do are things like all sorts of reports, grant applications, ethics/data management applications, recommendation letters, bureaucratic forms, etc. Which I wouldn't class as "worthwhile" in the sense that they don't require useful thinking, and I don't care one iota whether the text sounds like me or not as long as I get the silly requirement done. For these purposes, LLMs are a godsend and probably actually help me think more because I can devote more time to actual research and teaching, which I do in person.



Well if you want a rant about academia, I have many well prepared.

I think in the cases you describe the "thinking" was already purely performative, and what LLMs are doing is a kind of accelerationist project of undermining the performance by automating it.

I'm somewhat optimistic about this kind of self-destructive LLM use:

There are a few institutions where these purely-performative pseudo-thinking processes exist, ones insensitive to "existential feedback loops" which otherwise burn them down. I'm hopefully LLMs become a wildfire of destruction in these institutions and, absent external pressures, they return to actual thinking over the performative.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: