Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think a conclusion has been leaped to that is not necessarily true.

If everyone is getting the same annoying ad (in both wallet and App Store), then what individual user tracking or surveillance is happening? Certainly none is required.

It’s still annoying AF and it’s clear they didn’t learn their lesson from U2. But I don’t jump to the conclusion that “Apple is spying on me”. Instead I conclude “iOS leadership are greedy jerks with defective long term memory”.



I think the article rightly speaks of "trust-erosion" in connection with this incident because, in addition to the showing of ads being subject to the suspicion of surveillance, it raises the question how seriously we can take a wallet app that shows ads or does anything completely unrelated to its designated and propagated purpose, something that is not the reason why this app is used and in fact detracts everyone from the intended use of this app.

The breakdown of trust is already in the question "What absurdity comes next from such a sensitive app?"


> If everyone is getting the same annoying ad (in both wallet and App Store)

Not everyone is. I’m in the EU and did not get it. I wouldn’t be surprised if this was only in the US.

> then what individual user tracking or surveillance is happening?

That’s not at all what most people (including this article) are complaining about. It’s about an ad in an app which should never ever ever have them, the targeting is really low on the list of priorities compared to the rest.

> it’s clear they didn’t learn their lesson from U2.

The two cases are nothing alike. They both involved Apple and backlash, and that’s where the similarities end.

> But I don’t jump to the conclusion that “Apple is spying on me”.

Again, that’s not the major issue most people are complaining about.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: