Who says it's Craigslist's data? Last I checked the general public generates this data without compensation from Craigslist. Both legally and morally, it is their data.
This would be like the USPS claiming my mail is actually theirs. They provide a value-added service, but that grants neither legal nor moral claim over my information.
> " In fact, it seems pretty justified in this case."
Encourage third-party developers to scrape the site and use your data, claiming that your company is only concerned about undue server load.
Wait until third-party developer develops something that might actually be worth something. Allow third-party developer to gain traction and evangelize this product concept to the world.
Use legal force to shut down third-party developer and re-implement his product yourself.
... What part of that strikes you sas "pretty justified"?
"You automatically grant and assign to CL, and you represent and warrant that you have the right to grant and assign to CL, a perpetual, irrevocable, unlimited, fully paid, fully sub-licensable (through multiple tiers), worldwide license to copy, perform, display, distribute, prepare derivative works from (including, without limitation, incorporating into other works) and otherwise use any content that you post. You also expressly grant and assign to CL all rights and causes of action to prohibit and enforce against any unauthorized copying, performance, display, distribution, use or exploitation of, or creation of derivative works from, any content that you post (including but not limited to any unauthorized downloading, extraction, harvesting, collection or aggregation of content that you post)."
By posting, you're agreeing they can do whatever they want with your data and prohibit others from taking it from their site. Morally and legally, I think they are in the clear. There is no moral right to be able to scrape someone else's site and use their data because you want to.
I don't think they encourage people to scrape their data at all. They have a long history of blocking people and stopping people from doing exactly that.
Their data, their rules. It's not like Twitter where they pretended to be developer friendly and screwed over everyone. Craigslist was NEVER developer friendly. They were pretty upfront about it. PadMapper knew what they were getting into, even acknowledged they were in the wrong, and continued to do what they were doing anyways. How Craigslist gets portrayed as the bad guy is shocking to me.
This would be like the USPS claiming my mail is actually theirs. They provide a value-added service, but that grants neither legal nor moral claim over my information.
> " In fact, it seems pretty justified in this case."
Encourage third-party developers to scrape the site and use your data, claiming that your company is only concerned about undue server load.
Wait until third-party developer develops something that might actually be worth something. Allow third-party developer to gain traction and evangelize this product concept to the world.
Use legal force to shut down third-party developer and re-implement his product yourself.
... What part of that strikes you sas "pretty justified"?