Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Because transactional databases are perfectly fine for this type of thing when you have 0 to 100k users.


The article is about scaling issues with tons of writes, which I referenced by saying “tons of writes”. Yes, if there is no reason to scale it up you can just use a database. But that’s not the context.


The total number of users in your system is not a performance characteristic. And transactions are generally wrong for write-heavy anything. Further, if you can just append then the transaction is meaningless.


Most systems are based on the number of users performing operations on the application. Majority of people on HN never work on anything with more than 100k users, yet they introduce mountains of infrastructure and blame cloud for being expensive when they never needed that infrastructure to begin with.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: