Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Your suspicion makes total sense.

A major problem with the whole model of production is that if you make a good product and saturate the market you die. It’s not the result of some conspiracy to make shit products. It’s a simple outcome from the fact that purchases are one time while businesses are ongoing, combined with shareholder demands to boost growth. Those demands in turn come from things like pension funds that have promised a return to their customers.

One “solution” is to build subscriptions into everything but there’s already a customer revolt against that for obvious reasons. It’s obnoxious.

I think the best solution is to decouple and unbundle production. Have small design houses (or even individuals) that design products and have low ongoing costs and big manufacturing concerns that make things. Something always needs to be made so they always have business. Design products around commodity parts as much as possible to make retooling affordable.

This kind of already exists in the form of boutiques with kickstarter and Etsy products, or at least those folks have trailblazed this model.



'big manufacturing concerns that make things'

Don't we already have this, isn't this called 'China' for most American businesses that no longer make things in the USA/in-house?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: