Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Seems like there’s a few places Postgres could benefit from some more consistency checks.


Easier said than done in this case. Actually effective crosschecks preventing this issue from occurring would entail rather massive I/O and CPU amplification in common operations.


we could have run with https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/app-pgchecksums.html turned on, but it slows things down a bunch - and turning it on in retrospect would have taken days. Also not clear that it would have caught whatever the underlying corruption was here…




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: