Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

allowing no discussion to happen seems wrong

Could it actually be right?

It's hard for me to feel like these political flagfests make the rest of the site any better, while the rest of the site is what I find value in. If I want to witness mobs possessing massive standard deviations in knowledge and experience with the subject matter flamewarring each other, there are already a whole lot of places on the Internet I can go for that. It's the tech-and-genuine-curiosity-not-yelling part of HN that's the value prop for me here, and FWIW, for a sample size of one, threads like this do little to improve on that.

Of course I can hide this story and move on. But it's hard for me to believe that all the stress hormones flowing in the people reading and participating don't have some kind of negative knock-on effects on other, more peaceful threads.



The problem with this line of reasoning is that a few bad faith actors can kill any topic on the site simply by showing up and being unpleasant.


Seems like the existing mechanisms and moderation are designed to already handle this case to me. No?


We turn off flags in some (though not all) of those cases.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: