Fact:
“Matt stoller gets big, important issues wrong in antitrust all the time and his analysis shouldn’t be taken seriously.”
Source: me
You are welcome to cite that.
Sure you _might_ be a doctor, but your position is objectively deficient on this topic.
ALSO WEIRDLY, it's noticeable you didn't have anything to say about the fact that he's strawmanning.
You don't need a hyper focus in any field to see that's exactly what the author did. Or the fact that you don't seem to care about it.
Want to explain that one buddy?
Fact:
“Matt stoller gets big, important issues wrong in antitrust all the time and his analysis shouldn’t be taken seriously.”
Source: me
You are welcome to cite that.