Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I agree, although I think the 'trick' is even more devious. Let's presume this is fake, there are no stolen documents, and Romney's campaign wisely pays nothing. Then the blackmailers quit bluffing and silently drop out of sight. From the public's point-of-view, this result is indistinguishable from Romney paying $1M to prevent the release.

The campaign really only has two options: ignore it, or try to get the blackmailers arrested. If they ignore it, many will conclude that they must have paid to prevent incriminating documents from being released. If they pursue legal channels, they'll call more attention to the tax returns, and in the worst case may even cause the real returns to be revealed by the court.

It's really no win for them.




From another comment thread, I saw transactions on the two Bitcoin accounts are public, so we would know if the ransom was paid.


Another option, pay the ransom yourself and then there would be no way for Romney to prove it wasn't him.


We can confirm a particular account got paid, but we can not rule out a person got paid -- simply because it's easy to get new account to be paid at.

So parent post's point stands -- his campaign can't reliably claim they ignored the blackmailer.


All bitcoin transactions are public.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: