Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I find the hubris of this article absolutely disheartening, and toxic, and it frankly just reinforces how Wikipedia isn't a good place, and people who shouldn't have control over it have control over it.

And it isn't because of the self promoting described, but because of the response to it.

Deletionists are evil.



Could you expand on why you feel that this series of deletions is wrong?


Apart from the fact that this was pure self-promotion, it was also spamming the Wikipedias of small language communities with low-effort autotranslated garbage, which I think is rather insulting.


Care to explain what was bad about the response?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: