> glibc's binary compatibility story has been very good since the release of 2.2 or so, way back in 2000
It has been better than most but they recently broke loading libraries that declared they need an executable stack (even if the library never used it) and there doesn't seem to be a plan to actually fix the backwards compatibility issue.
It has been better than most but they recently broke loading libraries that declared they need an executable stack (even if the library never used it) and there doesn't seem to be a plan to actually fix the backwards compatibility issue.