Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

EU is #2 (behind the US) in terms of net sales accounting for 26% in 2024. There is no "or else".


I would think profits are more important than sales.

>...there’s evidence to believe the regulation is designed to extract from companies, rather than protect consumers: as we’ll see, the bloc often imposes massive, clearly premeditated fines immediately after compliance deadlines...

>...

>The fines permitted under both regulations are unprecedented; the DSA permits fines of up to 6% of a company’s global annual revenue, while the DMA permits fines of up to 10% of a company’s global annual revenue, and an egregious 20% for repeat offenses.

https://www.piratewires.com/p/eu-weaponizes-regulation-us-te...

The EU can write itself a check for up to 26% of Apple's annual revenue (6% + 20%). Coincidentally, that's the same as your 26% number for Apple net sales from the EU. But if Apple gets fined 26%, that represents a huge loss of capital since they still have to pay for COGS, pay taxes, pay employee salaries, and so forth.


I would consider it incredibly unlikely to happen, but based on how much money they're banking, I'd say Apple could probably afford to live without the EU.


That’ll go over well with investors.

“Hey, we’ve decided to cut 25% of our revenue”

The stock price would love it


Not with the declines they're seeing in China.


For how long? Or at least, how long after they lose their second largest consumer market do shareholders demand a shakeup of leadership?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: