Ok, so you want to rewrite the existing legal force framework. Again, good luck with that. Folks who argue this rarely provide a coherent alternative that holds up to scrutiny.
> ‘If a cop can arrest or shoot you, then you should be able to arrest and shoot cops too.’
Let me know when you’ve proposed a coherent legal framework that’s actually consistent with that idea.
Why not? Castle doctrine is already a thing in some states which allows you to shoot anyone including cops if they threaten you on your property and I think its a valid policy.
How does rule of law and property rights suffer? Rule of law will improve if cops are not given special rights. They would think twice before doing anything illegal.
> ‘If a cop can arrest or shoot you, then you should be able to arrest and shoot cops too.’
Let me know when you’ve proposed a coherent legal framework that’s actually consistent with that idea.