Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Lot of people restating their discomfort but no examples.

It suggests they know these are not things to be said in mixed company and the real discomfort is the PSF events have become mixed company for them.



Still nothing. Lol

I'm happy to give people the benefit of the doubt. But this specific topic I don't think I've ever seen someone actually provide a real answer.


I’m not willing to provide examples, because they would identify me. I’m not willing to identify myself because I’m not comfortable doing so.

Your response - “You're saying you feel excluded because you can't tell racist jokes?” - is a sufficient example of my point. Not only did I not imply that, but “racist jokes” aren’t even relevant to the conversation.

I refuse to defend myself against completely unfounded allegations.


For someone upset about having to worry about offending people in the workplace, you sure get offended easily.

I was primarily being hyperbolic. My main point is that generally people who are upset are upset that they can no longer say or do objectionable things in the workplace. Meanining every single person I have ever met in real life that complains about this stuff are the same ones who say horribly racist/misogynistic/homophobic stuff.

I'm asking, in all sincerity, what is one example of something you think is perfectly reasonable that you now have to avoid saying. Just one single example. I'd be thrilled if I could get one, because not only have I not seen one in this thread, but I have never seen one from anyone since this became a talking point years ago. It doesn't have to relate specifically to your workplace, you can generalize enough that it wouldn't be clear who you are or where you work.


> I'm asking, in all sincerity, what is one example of something you think is perfectly reasonable that you now have to avoid saying

At one point, one of my social media profile began with “Father, husband, […]” - basically a list of the things that are most important to me. I was berated online for this after responding to a post by someone by offering a suggestion to a technical problem. This was about a month before PyCon, and both I and that person were in attendance. They made reference to their “joke” in a very public way - at least two others who had participated in the thread online were there, and they laughed and continued to name the entire list that my profile contained.

To be clear - I was not inferring that they were making fun of me, this was in direct response to a question I had asked during the Q&A portion of a talk. They were loud enough that the speaker called for quiet because they were unable to hear the following question.

I attempted to file a complaint following the PSF process, and was told “since this happened off-site, there’s nothing we can do.”

The following day the same person referenced that someone had tried to attempted a complaint about them, calling it “fragile masculinity”.

There have been other instances, one of which was significantly more serious and resulted in a close friend of mine leaving software engineering as a career entirely. I will not share that one - there’s no benefit to doing so, it would hurt my friend if they were to be reminded of it, and it would very likely identify me.


It means that you were not really looking, because you could easily find examples that caused the chilling effect (even if it did not cause the firing, but a simple HR talk).

How about you check the content of DEI indoctrination classes, what constitutes offense? Like 2 people talking and the 3rd overhearing is a violation. Like not playing with the fantasies and embracing reality is a violation. Being against (the "wrong one") discrimination is a violation. Like communicating too much with a woman is a violation as is talking too little. Don't let me started on a microaggression BS. In general, it is a violation if any delusional person decides to be offended, no matter the reality.

Did you know that liking progress, efficiency, technology, as well as simply being on time is a core of white suppremacy culture that is improperly and racially being imposed on the Black population? Now that you know (like we estsblished, the opinion of only one minority person like myself is enough to make it a fact) that you are a racist, you must repent.

Your clear dishonesty and bad-faith acting is what causes people to not engage you, not the lack of examples.


I have taken the classes and it really isn't as hard to follow the guidelines as you seem to be painting it.

> Like 2 people talking and the 3rd overhearing is a violation

This is the principle that "locker-room talk" in the workplace is not okay, and that's a good principle. Yes, it's not okay to have a "just us guys" conversation because the content of the conversation is not acceptable in the workplace. The fact a third-party overhearing it gets it reported isn't the issue.

> Like not playing with the fantasies and embracing reality is a violation

You'll have to be more specific about what fantasies you mean. I'm pretty sure I know, but you are continuing to dance around it and your reluctance to name words strongly suggests you know your opinion is unwelcome in polite society.

> Being against (the "wrong one") discrimination is a violation

Again, you'll have to be more clear. Sounds like you're toeing the line Damore toed before Google fired him.

> Like communicating too much with a woman is a violation as is talking too little

Neither of these are violations, and I don't think I know how someone concludes they are.

> Don't [g]et me started on [] microaggression BS

Microaggression theory is grounded in research dating back to the 1970s. Do you have some specific concerns with the research or its interpretation? The theory seems pretty sound from where I sit, but maybe I've missed something.

> Did you know that liking progress, efficiency, technology, as well as simply being on time is a core of white suppremacy culture that is improperly and racially being imposed on the Black population?

That's not at all what anyone has said. You are misinterpreting several layers of information that suggest to me that your frustration is second-hand. I'm going to have to call for a "cite your sources" on this claim.

> In general, it is a violation if any delusional person decides to be offended, no matter the reality.

This is, broadly, untrue.


> Like not playing with the fantasies and embracing reality is a violation.

What does this even mean? Can you give me one specific concrete example of what you want to say in the workplace that you think will end up in a conversation with HR?

I have gone through literally all the same corporate training everyone else has for 20 years across 5 different companies. I have always worked in fairly diverse places, and have never once experienced what you're talking about.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: