They already hit a dead end and cannot innovate any further. Instead of being more accurate and deterministic, tuning the model so it produces more human-like tokens is one of a few tricks left to attract investors money.
Of course I can't "prove" it, just like you can't "prove" yours, but I am involved in the field and no-one I know thinks we're even close to a "dead end". On the contrary, people are more bullish than ever.
I don't have any inside knowledge of OpenAI's product release priorities, but your narrative about dead ends and desperate scrambles to push something out the door, tricking investors to keep the party going - this has nothing to do with reality as far as I can tell.
like 20 years ago or even before that? and if so - what does your winning even prove exactly here, save for the fact that it is never late to tap oneself by the shoulder for having done stuff?
