> Your vacuum cleaner example is ignorant, blockchain is humanity's last way to resist censorship.
You're missing the same point. I was pointing out that the conversation was about hype, not best-case scenarios. The point is that if the tech industry latches onto some new thing, it will be shoved into absolutely everything regardless of its relevance or usefulness to a particular problem. For every open-source project that's driven by smart, passionate developers with a clear goal in mind, you will have ten vacuum cleaners. The new thing that is the object of the hype doesn't matter in this context. That's why they called AI the "new blockchain" - it's not an assessment of how good or bad one is against the other, it's pointing out that both have attained the status of a VC buzzword after being popularized enough.
Local LLMs are actually pretty good, and I've used some in the past when I was more interested in them. Certainly there's a gap between them and the hyper-centralized corporate offerings that can afford to throw endless free compute at you just to retain you as a customer, but it's not like they are inadequate or something. Once the hype dies down, local will probably be the choice of any sane, security-conscious company and open-source devs.
I don't like the conception of buzzwords to be honest. I understood all what you have said from the beginning but I do not see how using the buzzword word enriches the conversation. It is seems for me that the "buzzword" word has some characteristics of the buzzword conception. Why using buzzwords, why not using some real words?
The worst in the buzzword conception is that it leads to using good things as the buzzwords because the bad things get forgotten quickly. Before blockchain the popular buzzword was "webvan" but there are too few people who rememberes what the webvan was for really using this word as a meme.
Using the blockchain word as a synonym for buzzword word is like using a good word meaning some good thing for describing some bad concept and it makes me crazy. Name it the "new webvan" for adding some flavor of failure, or the "new iphone" for adding some flavor of popularity. What flavor do you add by using my favorite technology as an example?
You're missing the same point. I was pointing out that the conversation was about hype, not best-case scenarios. The point is that if the tech industry latches onto some new thing, it will be shoved into absolutely everything regardless of its relevance or usefulness to a particular problem. For every open-source project that's driven by smart, passionate developers with a clear goal in mind, you will have ten vacuum cleaners. The new thing that is the object of the hype doesn't matter in this context. That's why they called AI the "new blockchain" - it's not an assessment of how good or bad one is against the other, it's pointing out that both have attained the status of a VC buzzword after being popularized enough.
Local LLMs are actually pretty good, and I've used some in the past when I was more interested in them. Certainly there's a gap between them and the hyper-centralized corporate offerings that can afford to throw endless free compute at you just to retain you as a customer, but it's not like they are inadequate or something. Once the hype dies down, local will probably be the choice of any sane, security-conscious company and open-source devs.