Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

well they were using Unreal engine before and it was much slower as indicated. they managed to get what they wanted at 8k/60fps which was also their goal so three.js was right for them?


I'm not saying it was the wrong choice in hindsight but Three.js is not particularly fast either so I'm surprised they managed to get 8k/60 out of it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: