I think this is where the phrase "It goes without saying" comes from. Of course most people agree that litigious pseudoscience is bad. People don't make comments to that effect because it is like reading a newspaper article about a mugging and going to the comments to point out that the mugger sounds like a very mean person.
Basically, outrage is a boring thing to read about. If we have productive ideas about what to do about this, that's good, and if we have insights about the matter (e.g. the Romanian legal system), that's good, but it's fairly pointless just to comment, "Grr, this is wrong and I am very angry, rabble rabble rabble."
Basically, outrage is a boring thing to read about. If we have productive ideas about what to do about this, that's good, and if we have insights about the matter (e.g. the Romanian legal system), that's good, but it's fairly pointless just to comment, "Grr, this is wrong and I am very angry, rabble rabble rabble."