I think it is important to read more about epinions. Beyond the fact that it is pretty much dead today, was firesaled, and was had some nasty interpersonal personnel issues, I think it is a classic example of a company with a unmanageable story:
"Here's how it works: we convince people to write opinions. And then when someone else reads that opinion, and ranks it highly, we'll give the writer a piece of an affiliate link sale."
There's way, way, way too many steps involved in making a few pennies.
The story that you tell your users (all of them) is very important. Epinion's was pretty miserable.
A buddy of mine said that one of the reasons that Google's a money machine is that it is dead easy for a neophyte web advertiser to set up an ad:
1. Pick some words
2. Pick how much you want to pay
3. Done.
Its also something Niklas Zennstrom articulates about picking problems to solve: pick simple propositions e.g. Skype: free phone calls, Joost: Tv when you want it, Kazaa: share files easily in order to reach a mainstream market.
Whats your background btw - shoot me an email, i'm pretty interested.
I love the fact that this aggregator pulls up articles before the bubble. The language and the tone of the entire article is like nothing can go wrong. It's great.
It's also interesting that the author of the article foreshadowed "Web 2.0" before it was coined 5 years later. The Tom Sawyer model. Brilliant.
> Everything is faster. Zero drag is optimal. For a while, new applicants would jokingly be asked about their ''drag coefficient.'' Since the office is a full hour's commute from San Francisco, an apartment in the city was a full unit of drag. A spouse? Drag coefficient of one. Kids? A half point per. Then they recognized that such talk, even in jest, could be taken as discriminatory in a hiring situation.
"Could be taken as"? It is discriminatory. And Epinions failed; the Reddit team built a more valuable property with a tiny fraction of the time and effort.
Still around since 1999, but it still sucks seriously does anyone even use epinions. I have never found it useful while searching and comparing products online.
I guess that is a good thing since we are working on a competitor of sorts.
"Here's how it works: we convince people to write opinions. And then when someone else reads that opinion, and ranks it highly, we'll give the writer a piece of an affiliate link sale."
There's way, way, way too many steps involved in making a few pennies.
The story that you tell your users (all of them) is very important. Epinion's was pretty miserable.
A buddy of mine said that one of the reasons that Google's a money machine is that it is dead easy for a neophyte web advertiser to set up an ad:
1. Pick some words 2. Pick how much you want to pay 3. Done.
That's the level of story you want to tell.
Measure your story against that.