Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
Marc Andreesen Launches VC Fund (pehub.com)
38 points by johnnygalt on Feb 20, 2009 | hide | past | favorite | 16 comments



This is a bigger deal than just the arrival of a new VC fund. It is, as far as I know, the first VC fund run by hackers.

Almost all existing VC funds are run by business/finance guys. I know a total of two VC partners who write code. And one of the two only made partner last summer.


Are there many funds that invest $100,000 - $500,000? From the people I've talked to, that seems to be one of the hardest amounts to raise. Too big for angels, too small for VCs. Matt Maroon has some good stories about this.


Some big funds are willing to invest small amounts. Sequoia will, for example. But the big funds can't do too many deals like that, or it breaks their model.


Would you not consider YC to be a venture capitalist ? Or do you characterize it as an angel operation ?

From the homepage "Y Combinator is a new kind of venture firm specializing in funding early stage startups. We help startups through what is for many the hardest step, from idea to company."

You definitely strike me as a hacker :)


Firm != fund. A fund invests other people's money, in return for management fees and a percentage of the net return. Though of course the partners can have some of their own money in the fund.

We're financially more like angels, but systematic like a fund.


Genuine question: what's the practical difference between the investments that he was doing as an angel, compared to the VC fund-to-be?

Was he, as an angel investor, doing any deal below the 100k-500k range?


Angel = investing your own money

VC = investing other people's money and taking a management fee

In this case I would think Andreeson is both a partner and an investor.


Hm. Not sure about VCs investing other peoples money. Some companies I work for that definitely position themselves as VCs have all the money brought in by the partners in the company.

I think an angel is a person, just the one guy/girl doing the investment, a VC is a fund that has multiple sources, possibly outsiders but also in some cases the partners themselves. Some funds are simply more 'open' to outsider investors.


Angels don't take board seats.


It depends upon their investment model. The Angels Forum will create a syndicate and a lead angel for each investment and negotiate for a board seat for the lead.


Ok. Angels _rarely_ take a board seat. If they're taking one, it's not really an angel deal.

(I'm speaking now from both having taken angel investment -- and been one.)

You really shouldn't be giving up that much control in the first go, anyway.


probably angel = him doing the investment/research by himself and VC = other people involved, either as other investors into the fund or as employees



Hm... $500k per deal still sounds more like angel investment than VC. Although, Tumblr's series A was 750k. This has been an ongoing trend but it looks like the boundaries between the size of angel and VC investment is beginning to blur as startups become scrapppier and stop looking for too much outside investment.

I wonder if this means it's going to become easier to raise money.


Not sure if folks here saw that video/read the transcript -- many interesting comments, including Andrew Chen starting something viral.


A guy at a conference referred to Loudcloud as 'Loudmouth', referring to Andreessen's self-promotion. Pretty amusing, but unfair.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: