Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Gender imbalance is an issue, but forcing panels to be unrepresentative of the fields they're discussing is hardly going to fix it. The fundamental issue is that notable people in technology are almost entirely male. We need to encourage girls to come into technology fields at the bottom. Perhaps ensuring public panels contain notable female role models would be a way of doing that, but if the panels purpose is for very specific technical discussion arbitrarily increasing female participation to levels significantly above what is representative of the field being discussed isn't really going to help anything.


Girls are less likely to go into a field if they don't see women representatives of that field.


Girls are less likely to go into a field if they see that they are treated differently because of their gender.

See, I can make blanket statements with no proof also.


Certainly in very public non-technical discussion, female representation on panels is important. However, very technical panel discussions are so industry specific that girls are not going to be looking at them for role models. In highly technical panel discussion, membership should be selected on merit not gender.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: