> It has a time and a place, but you wouldn’t use Times New Roman on your startup’s website, would you?
Only because I have a thing about using serif fonts in html, otherwise it might well be one of my fallbacks.
And besides, arguing that people should put more effort into restyling Bootstrap is different than arguing they should abandon it altogether. In terms of providing a framework for layouts, I think it does its job quite well, and that users will probably intuitively understand a Bootstrap site because they've encountered them a hundred times before. This in turn gives your site an implied sense of stability and trustworthiness since it "looks like twitter/etc etc."
Only because I have a thing about using serif fonts in html, otherwise it might well be one of my fallbacks.
And besides, arguing that people should put more effort into restyling Bootstrap is different than arguing they should abandon it altogether. In terms of providing a framework for layouts, I think it does its job quite well, and that users will probably intuitively understand a Bootstrap site because they've encountered them a hundred times before. This in turn gives your site an implied sense of stability and trustworthiness since it "looks like twitter/etc etc."