> This would allow imaging of forests, fields, and streams, but not man-made objects like roads, bridges, dams, or the more navigable waters (might contain humans).
I wonder how much of a stretch it would be to imagine some court ruling that trees could be considered man-made objects if they were planted by humans.
I would say this law would be a pain for farmers and ranchers that are taking the next steps in technology. Plus architects would get caught eventually.
I wonder how much of a stretch it would be to imagine some court ruling that trees could be considered man-made objects if they were planted by humans.