Ironically, people said he should have handled the commit differently, and perhaps he should have.
But here we are talking about him 1 year later. I think he probably shouldn't have done it, but on which side of the pg/YC line of creative subversion did his stunt actually fall?
Well let's be fair, we're talking about him because he didn't rest on his laurels, he's been out there doing more and more.
Personally I thought it was hilarious, you can hardly be more gentle in the process of 0wning a system like that and as I recall he did try to warn them beforehand.
But here we are talking about him 1 year later. I think he probably shouldn't have done it, but on which side of the pg/YC line of creative subversion did his stunt actually fall?