What a pleasantly amicable settlement of what could have been a thorny issue. I get so used to people trying to abuse patents and trademarks I'm now shocked when they say "Oh, ok, I see what you mean, fine we'll do this differently."
Yea, it's nice to see. Though the cynical side of my brain is thinking that Veber backed down because they knew their customer base is basically all techies and they might not want to piss them off. If Veber was in a different business line and had branded and trademarked let's say their line of high performance tyres, I think they might not have backed down so readily.
Still glad it worked out, Veber deserves credit for that no matter the ultimate motive.
Edit: Guess I'm mistaken, thanks for the correction duskwuff
If the trademark application had been for tyres, the issue wouldn't have arisen at all.
Trademarks are usually registered for a specific category of goods or services -- hence, we can have Monster energy drinks and Monster.com job search and Monster cables all trademarked by different companies, since they're all different categories. The issue here was that Veber was trying to register a "Python" trademark that would have conflicted with the PSF's existing use of the name.
I don't believe they are in the hosting business and don't know what Python is.
They're either idiots or at the contrary, quite clever.
Had they gone through with it though, they might have suffered a bit of wrath from some anonymous pythonistas... I could see it happen. :-D
Can someone explain to me why anyone would want to sue the python foundation? I mean, maybe if the company was unrelated to programming... but a hosting company? Wouldn't they know?
[The CEO]confirmed that he'd not involved any technical staff in the decisions he'd made about the Python product brand, and told me he regretted that as it would probably have helped him understand the likely reaction to his trademark challenge.
They weren't suing the PSF. They were registering "Python" as a trademark and the PSF was trying to prevent that from happening.
Sounds like this company recognized the potential damage going against the PSF would have to their cloud service offering, even if they might technically have been in the right. Good for them!
