And if it's at a conference, I don't have a choice because I'm paying to go and learn something. If it's an afterparty, I have to miss out on spending time with people I wouldn't get a chance to see easily otherwise. I also miss out on general networking and business opportunities galore, not to mention whatever good food and drinks and music is around. What am I going to do? Go sulk in my hotel room or go home, or wander around until my ride is ready to go? Find another party with yet another asshole?
Or should I just try to drill this into peoples' heads: Nobody should ever have to be the one that leaves a party because they're offended by one person out of tens/hundreds. It's every partygoer's obligation not to be an asshole to others. The asshole can leave or shut up and apologize if necessary.
You don't have to leave the party, just walk to another area. I agree it's not ideal but sometimes that's what needs to be done. I agree partygoer's shouldn't be assholes (or cunts).
You have quite a way of expressing yourself. Hopefully at the next conference I can sit next to you and let you know just how much I enjoy your opinions. You can always leave if it bothers you.
I like to play devil's advocate every now and then to see how people react. That being said, I am a true believer in freedom of speech. It's a double edged sword though as it gives people the right to say inappropriate and inconsiderate things. But I'll take that any day over censorship. I don't go to conferences as I prefer user group meetings.
> I like to play devil's advocate every now and then to see how people react
Easily interpreted as trolling. I think you're doing yourself a disservice.
One person telling another to "shut it" is not censorship. Both have a right to speak their minds. Censorship is when you're told by someone with authority that what you're saying/writing/expressing should not be expressed for whatever set of reasons.
You telling someone to "just go away" is equal to this.
There's a standard in the US that your right to free speech shall be upheld but not in the case of hate speech or insighting unrest and violence (also known as trolling). This is for very good reason (ask Weev what he thinks) - which is that we need some form of law to protect us from one person riling up a mob to violence, or a single deranged person from stalking and harassing another.
Trolling a community to provoke thought and discourse is a time-honored profession that predates the internet by millennia (Jesus is often considered one of the best trolls in history).
Taking a contrary position "just because" or for sport is rude. But it's tolerated. How much of me would you like to tolerate in person? Here, online, I'm just a name in a message thread. In person it's a whole different deal. You have rights to protect you from my thoughts, and I have rights to express those thoughts.
Or should I just try to drill this into peoples' heads: Nobody should ever have to be the one that leaves a party because they're offended by one person out of tens/hundreds. It's every partygoer's obligation not to be an asshole to others. The asshole can leave or shut up and apologize if necessary.