Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I assumed this was because a pool of funds had been set up to prop up Romney's odds to make him appear more viable -- or at least to stave off a story that Intrade users were betting heavily against him. Intrade was a small enough market that this could have been done with a comparatively small investment compared to media buys, and without any technological or financial chicanery. It's not illegal to pay too much for something that could have been had for less.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: