That's not how I read his comment -- I think you're reading accusation into the phrase "why wouldn't you" that isn't really there.

I realise that without context it could be ambiguous, but since even the headline indicates that the guy has already come forward, I doubt jere was unaware of that.

'jere was probably protesting why Salah didn't come out to say it wasn't him /immediately/, 'gee_totes responded by explaining he in fact did go to the police pretty much right away (i.e., yesterday, as soon as he became aware of the NYPost, etc.)

Perhaps jere should come forward and explain the innocence of his comment.

Oh, the irony here.

jere's was a rhetorical question. It took me a second to get it but I got it on first reading. One clue was the lack of a question mark.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_question