Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Docker looks like it is *nix only. It CAN be run on windows and Mac...inside a VM, which kind of eliminates all the advantages they talk about.

An option is Vagrant (Which Docker uses on the above OSes) + chef / puppet.

It uses VMs but works well enough for me and both configuration engines have widespread support. http://docs-v1.vagrantup.com/v1/docs/getting-started/




Not *nix only, Linux only. Solaris and FreeBSD have totally different container mechanisms, which honestly are probably better understood and vetted at this point than the LXC approach.


Running docker inside doesn't eliminate all the advantages. For example, you can test a full stack of components (frontend, database, memcache, background workers...) on a single VM, instead of deploying 1 vm per component, which gets really heavy really fast.

Another advantage is that docker on a vm is still docker: the container running on your local VM is 100% identical, bute-for-byte, to the container you will run on an octo-core box with half a tera of ram.


I hate the small delays of a VM environment though.

Rails already has some minor loading issues, adding a VM to that can be very frustrating - I imagine.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: