> In fact it wouldn't surprise me if you haven't read any of her work.
Try "all her novels and at least 4 books of essays". In fact, I seem to have read more Rand than many Objectivists. It was a while ago, though, and the books have long since left my possession.
Let me guess - your next argument will be "you didn't understand it then". If so, we're done here, for the same reason I don't argue with Christian fundamentalists who claim I don't understand Christianity.
edit: Sorry, some of your other assertions amuse me.
> Also, it's interesting that you don't try to reconcile the fact that the Y Combinator is one of the most successful startup incubators ever, and that there is a large presence of Ayn Rand fans on here.
I guess you found "maybe the ability to believe bullshit... is a strength" confusing. I chose the word "strength" for a reason, although "advantage" would fit well too.
I also covered that in another thread, where you were perfectly welcome to reply. Nobody did.
> Do ya think there might be a connection there?
Correlation? Not without better data. But even if there is a correlation, that is not causation; and I find it hard to take someone who would assert otherwise seriously as a thinker.
So here's one for you. What proportion of successful YC startups were founded by Objectivists? What proportion of failed or abandoned ones were?
> In my experience it's very rare to meet a person who calls themselves an Objectivist who isn't way above average in intelligence and ambition.
In my experience it's very rare to meet a person who ridicules Objectivism who isn't way above average in intelligence, perceptiveness and sensitivity.
Shall we get into a pissing match about whose experience is better, or shall we simply agree that personal experience is not a useful data point?
> All the guys I knew from university who were Objectivists are now either working at Google
What argument of yours should I respond to? then one where you assert without any evidence that her work is bullshit?
You think you can just dismiss an entire body of thought by throwing out ad hominems?
Look, I know that you're smart enough to know that I'm a pretty smart guy, so comparing me to a "Christian fundamentalist" just makes you look ridiculous. Offer a serious argument to support your claims (as I did to support mine, if you read the above posts) or just don't bother posting.
Edit (response to above "edit", since you didn't feel like writing a new post): This really isn't going anywhere, let's just leave it here. I'm sure you're a top notch programmer, but seriously man it's just not cool to go around name-calling people you disagree with. I replied to your posts with respect, so did everyone else on this site.
> then one where you assert without any evidence that her work is bullshit?
I didn't assert that, I implied that in the course of asserting something else.
> You think you can just dismiss an entire body of thought by throwing out ad hominems?
Yeah, actually I do, if it's a very small body and hasn't done much thinking.
> comparing me to a "Christian fundamentalist"
Again (and this is REALLY getting tedious), I didn't compare you to a Christian fundamentalist, I compared Objectivist arguments that I have heard before (and predicted that you would use, partly in order to ensure that you didn't) with those of Christian fundamentalists.
> I know that you're smart enough to know that I'm a pretty smart guy
Er, no - at the moment that is a conclusion I simply cannot draw. Your thinking displays evidence of being muddled and irrational, with little grasp of logic or ability to distinguish between claims made of the argument and claims made of the arguer.
I have no doubt that you think you're a pretty smart guy, and I bet you didn't have to work too hard at school to achieve results. But I also think that because of this, you tend to interpret criticism as a personal attack, and you are slow to recognise when someone really does have something to teach you, especially when you don't think that person is as bright as you think you are.
Someone else has come along and downmodded every single post I made in this thread. Result? Instant karma drop of 10%. By one person. Because I said something they didn't like.
pg, please delete or disable my account forthwith. I am not prepared to stay in a place where that's acceptable - and by allowing the behaviour, you make it acceptable. I would do it myself, but news.yc doesn't even allow me to change my fucking password. (I hope you're not storing them as plaintext.)
Try "all her novels and at least 4 books of essays". In fact, I seem to have read more Rand than many Objectivists. It was a while ago, though, and the books have long since left my possession.
Let me guess - your next argument will be "you didn't understand it then". If so, we're done here, for the same reason I don't argue with Christian fundamentalists who claim I don't understand Christianity.
edit: Sorry, some of your other assertions amuse me.
> Also, it's interesting that you don't try to reconcile the fact that the Y Combinator is one of the most successful startup incubators ever, and that there is a large presence of Ayn Rand fans on here.
I guess you found "maybe the ability to believe bullshit... is a strength" confusing. I chose the word "strength" for a reason, although "advantage" would fit well too.
I also covered that in another thread, where you were perfectly welcome to reply. Nobody did.
> Do ya think there might be a connection there?
Correlation? Not without better data. But even if there is a correlation, that is not causation; and I find it hard to take someone who would assert otherwise seriously as a thinker.
So here's one for you. What proportion of successful YC startups were founded by Objectivists? What proportion of failed or abandoned ones were?
> In my experience it's very rare to meet a person who calls themselves an Objectivist who isn't way above average in intelligence and ambition.
In my experience it's very rare to meet a person who ridicules Objectivism who isn't way above average in intelligence, perceptiveness and sensitivity.
Shall we get into a pissing match about whose experience is better, or shall we simply agree that personal experience is not a useful data point?
> All the guys I knew from university who were Objectivists are now either working at Google
...so no self-compromise there, then...
> some big time law firm
...where integrity is so highly prized...