Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

When does establishing a good defense (for an ally no less) become an act of aggression? Certainly it's not a purely passive act, but it's also a far cry from aggression seen by both Russia and the US in the past.


Two men have guns. One buys a bulletproof vest. Now he can bully the other one.

So, more defenses can lead to more conflict. Also, more offensive weapons can lead to less conflict:

One man has a gun. The other one buys a gun. Now there's peace.

So many people don't get game theory...


When the only thing that prevented war for 50 years was the concept of mutually assured destruction....


Especially including people like Stanislov Petrov's understanding of mutually assured destruction, and his willingness to martyr himself.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: