Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

yes but the recommended approach is to put CloudFront in front of it, if you care about performance at all


I think the point of their post, is that this is their "oh shit we are down" setup, which will consist of a small static site that S3 will happily serve up to anyone anywhere in the world very quickly. This isn't meant to be a full wack highly performant copy of their existing website fronted by CDN's.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: