Reductio ad absurdum, a perfectly legitimate form of proof, begs to differ with Mr. Godwin
Godwin's law isn't about legitimate forms of proof, it's about the level and quality of discourse. It's not saying you're wrong it's saying that your point would be stronger without Nazi references.
Godwin's law isn't about legitimate forms of proof, it's about the level and quality of discourse. It's not saying you're wrong it's saying that your point would be stronger without Nazi references.
Look at it as help, not refutation :)