I know. I've said as much (in reverse) to people pointing out that the USA shouldn't have been in Iraq but still somehow claiming that what Manning did is worth it if it leads to democracy in Arab countries.
But the USA never should have gone into Iraq based on what the leaders knew at the time. Why do you assume I think otherwise?
But the USA never should have gone into Iraq based on what the leaders knew at the time. Why do you assume I think otherwise?