>Can you mention a couple of key things that make your product diferent and desirable, instead of Flash?
It being built on standard web technologies, instead of in a proprietary engine, with a proprietary authoring environment, horrible security, subpar performance and CPU utilization and crappy or no GUI support (so you have to built everything on your own).
Built on standard Web technologies except for HTML and CSS, you mean; these are replaced by proprietary "equivalents." Which rather throws the "built on standard Web technologies" thing into some rather severe doubt.
It's installed on almost every PC for the last decade; it is called Flash.
Can you mention a couple of key things that make your product diferent and desirable, instead of Flash?
Because we remember other nice engines of this kind, e.g. Silverlight.