Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It doesn't seem unreasonable to me that the responding agency would want to have control of the scene. Worse than crazy flooding would be crazy flooding combined w a plane crash. The light aircraft that the article mentions likely would not see a drone and could easily hit it. Perhaps FEMA should be incorporating this type if drone into their response plan and I'm sure they could be doing it faster but having civilians flying unannounced and practically invisible as high as 1500 ft seems like an opportunity for disaster.



FAA handles aircraft regulation, and if there were issues with UAV's in the area, FAA would be responsible for enforcing those regulations.

FAA regulations on UAV's http://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/uas/uas_faq/

FEMA's own document on their legal authorities http://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nrf/nrf-authorities.pdf does not include any authority over aircraft.

EDIT: From FEMA's own documentation http://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nrf/nrf-esf-01.pdf: "DOT/Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is responsible for the operation and regulation of the U.S. National Airspace System, including during emergencies. "


I don't really see what that has to do with the parent comment's apparently reasonable concerns for safety.

So FEMA doesn't have authority and should go through the proper channels. I don't think anyone would dispute that if that's the case.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: