Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Their plan is to grow until they dock with the Deathstar.

If that was their plan, then I would think that $3B would be enough for them to drop anchor.

As a zero-revenue company, I would only deny that payday if either:

1) I believed that my company had the potential to be its own Deathstar. 2) I disliked the company that made the offer so much that I had nightmares about them owning my company. 3) I cared more about my company than the money.




4) he lost control and the board won't let him sell. Founder surely wants to sell. Unfortunately snapchat took $800M vc money, and his new VC bosses have completely different incentives to go for a long tail outcome. Which sucks because the founder is probably a lot more likely to get nothing than he is to get a huge exit and he knows it. Though as wengsing says he probably got a bunch of cash in prior rounds so maybe he doesn't really care.


The founder is surely already rich. The real losers in these cases are the employees with options. The outcome for them is very binary.


How about "4 - they think they can get a better offer"?


Pigs get fat. Hogs get slaughtered.


By this argument I would have sold at 10 million.


Or

4) I'm already so wealthy as a founder that's sold stock through multiple rounds of funding that I might as well wait for the $5B offer.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: