Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Seriously?

Because they're demanding the freedom of the telcos be overridden in favor of our own personal interests.



The telcos make extensive use of common property like licensed portions of the RF spectrum and a great deal of land in order to do their business. The people have every right to enforce regulations on the use of their property.


Seriously?

Because we don't call them inalienable corporate rights, we call them inalienable human rights. Equating a corporation to a human is part of what got us in a whole host of messes.


Would these be the same telcos that operate as regional public utility monopolies, subsidized by your taxes and mine?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_monopoly

Read about natural monopolies.


I strongly am in favor of freedom, but not a fully free market. And exactly for reasons like this: a fully free market destroys freedom.


The Free Market of libertarianism reknown doesn't exist and can't exist. For such a market to work, each participant needs perfect information and capacity. If you've had any involvement with business should be enough experience to understand that there's no such thing as perfect information once the product is more complex than say, an orange, and even then it'd be a stretch (grown where? what pesticides? which labour? which transport company? where are all the other places I can purchase this orange? ...)


> Because they're demanding the freedom of the telcos be overridden in favor of our own personal interests.

Imagine that someone was allowed to own the air, and then control / privileged what you are allowed to say (sound waves). Would your opinion be different?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: