Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Talk about deployment hell - puts things into perspective:

"to counteract the General Relativistic effect once on orbit, they slowed down the ticking frequency of the atomic clocks before they were launched"

The mind boggles.

It makes me uneasy that we only have this single system though (the effects of a GPS failure would be quite severe I guess). Do the people behind GPS collaborate with the Galileo folks?

Thanks a lot for the submit, now I need to find a good book on the history behind the GPS!



There used to be a terrestrial radionavigation system called Loran-C that could be used for positioning and timing, but it was decommissioned in 2010.

Loran-C was a high-power, low-frequency signal as opposed to the very-low-power, high-frequency signal of GPS. This made Loran-C less susceptible to jamming. It was a nice backup.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loran-C


There are multiple GNSS platforms - not just GPS & Galileo, but also GLONASS, Compass, IRNSS, and others. Some receivers are multi-system capable, such as: http://www.u-blox.com/en/gps-chips/stand-alone-gps-chips/ubx...


And the iPhone, Samsung Galaxy and others, at least assisted GPS + GLONASS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GLONASS#Receivers


Given that 4 satellites are necessary for a fix, are such receivers able to mix-and-match satellites, say, three GPS satellites and one GLONASS satellite?



The system is a bit more redundant now: there are now 32 satellites, and on average 9 are visibile from any point.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: