That still isn't a response to the question I asked; can you address that question?
And choosing an animal to be given up and taken to a shelter and possibly euthanized is nowhere near the same and shooting an animal on the premises. And again, that's a city-level ordinance, not a governmental one; it in no way applies to everybody, so I don't know why you're presenting it as inarguable fact.
Edit: Honestly, the fact that I need to ask a question three times when it was very clearly laid out indicates that you're just ignoring it, which I can only assume means you don't actually have an answer. If you're interested in actually having a discussion instead of just saying foolish things and refusing to back them up, then please address my question; otherwise, you've got some pretty messed up and honestly harmful ideas that you're proposing here and I hope you're never in a position to enforce your beliefs on anything else.
And choosing an animal to be given up and taken to a shelter and possibly euthanized is nowhere near the same and shooting an animal on the premises. And again, that's a city-level ordinance, not a governmental one; it in no way applies to everybody, so I don't know why you're presenting it as inarguable fact.
Edit: Honestly, the fact that I need to ask a question three times when it was very clearly laid out indicates that you're just ignoring it, which I can only assume means you don't actually have an answer. If you're interested in actually having a discussion instead of just saying foolish things and refusing to back them up, then please address my question; otherwise, you've got some pretty messed up and honestly harmful ideas that you're proposing here and I hope you're never in a position to enforce your beliefs on anything else.