Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

>This is a main reason I don't use Chrome. Since each tab is running under a sep process, there is no easy way to tell how much total memory is being used.

Seeing "how much memory is being used" is a major use case for you using a browser?

If a browsers works fast and doesn't leak memory, one shouldn't care how much memory exactly is used.




> If a browsers works fast and doesn't leak memory, one shouldn't care how much memory exactly is used.

That's a big assumption. Realistically speaking, there's only FF, Safari, and Chrome. FF leaks like crazy (sometimes on it's own but sometimes it could be a plugin). Safari doesn't support all the plugins I use and Chrome may but I'm don't like their dev console layout. And if you don't see how much mem is being used, you have no way of telling if a newly installed plugin just caused a memory leak (unless it just totally prevents you from using the browser).


Here's an idea: don't install plugins. They are mostly irrelevant to browsing.


I only use plugins that are relevant to my browsing. ABP, Boomerang, Buffer, DownThemAll, Firebug, NoScript, Wallaby...


> Seeing "how much memory is being used" is a major use case for you using a browser?

Yes, certainly. My development machine has 8 GB of RAM. On a number of occasions I've recovered from a marginal memory problem/commencement of disk swap by dumping Chrome. I should have more RAM, but still.

Chrome uses a lot of memory. Unless you have a ridiculous amount of RAM, there will be times when you'll notice the load.

> If a browsers works fast and doesn't leak memory, one shouldn't care how much memory exactly is used.

Not really. Not if you care about performance.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: