I suppose it depends on your political views. She was a core part of the administration that invaded an entire country on false premises and resulted in thousands of deaths.
Good point about the rest of her story though – she is a successful women and came from statistically unlikely circumstances.
Tough to balance those things out. In my view the participation in war crimes outweighs all other possible successes.
Edit: forgot to mention her role in authorizing torture.
>> administration that invaded an entire country on false premises
"Clinton also stated that, while other countries also had weapons of mass destruction, Hussein is in a different category because he has used such weapons against his own people and against his neighbors."
Are you publicly accusing Condalizza Rice of war crimes? Do you have proof? Does HN support your claims and are willing to fight a legal battle on your behalf or testify in your defense?
Good point about the rest of her story though – she is a successful women and came from statistically unlikely circumstances.
Tough to balance those things out. In my view the participation in war crimes outweighs all other possible successes.
Edit: forgot to mention her role in authorizing torture.